Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 30 MARY WHITE OVINGTON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

140

24%

LEVEL 3

138

24%

LEVEL 4

176

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

56

21%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

84

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

92

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

33

37%

LEVEL 4

39

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

110
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

85

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

116

30%

LEVEL 4

104

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

115

25%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

173

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

55

66%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

68

60%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

101

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

284
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

58

13%

LEVEL 2

105

23%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

162

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

39

46%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

69

51%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

27

31%

LEVEL 4

25

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

35

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

114

24%

LEVEL 2

115

24%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

141

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.