Skip to Content
Main content

PS 185 WALTER KASSENBROCK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

110

35%

LEVEL 4

93

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

123

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

51

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

65

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

59

41%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

58

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

19

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

67

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

88

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

91

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

119

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

26

49%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

201
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

109

37%

LEVEL 4

92

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

208
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

123

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

74

41%

LEVEL 4

66

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

88

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

49

38%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

27

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.