Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

277

60%

LEVEL 2

119

26%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

233

50%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

134

63%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

100

50%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

143

57%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

133

50%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

53

63%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

37

53%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

211

59%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

193

52%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

206

55%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

163

45%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

71

78%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

70

72%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

182

54%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

128

42%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

95

76%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

105

65%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

54

49%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

223

63%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

217

52%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.