Skip to Content
Main content

PS 8 ISAAC VARIAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

223

41%

LEVEL 2

155

29%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

217

44%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

95

19%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

108

41%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

99

43%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

118

45%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

23

42%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

21

48%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

111
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

190

45%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

146

36%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

133

36%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

77

60%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

84

67%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

120

30%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

131

36%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

103

73%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

86

63%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

29

40%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

194

42%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

86

18%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

195

45%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.