Skip to Content
Main content

PS 35 FRANZ SIEGEL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

197

56%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

152

47%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

99

57%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

76

49%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

98

54%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

76

46%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

38

42%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

39

44%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

153

61%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

107

49%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

138

49%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

59

79%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

52

69%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

120

46%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

91

39%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

77

84%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

61

69%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

188

55%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

138

47%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.