Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST # 8 - BRONX GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,045
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,615

LEVEL 1

5,658

45%

LEVEL 2

3,912

31%

LEVEL 3

2,023

16%

LEVEL 4

1,022

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,813
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,725

LEVEL 1

5,354

42%

LEVEL 2

3,558

28%

LEVEL 3

2,319

18%

LEVEL 4

1,494

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,459
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,048

LEVEL 1

2,582

43%

LEVEL 2

2,007

33%

LEVEL 3

965

16%

LEVEL 4

494

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,911
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,154

LEVEL 1

2,424

39%

LEVEL 2

1,819

30%

LEVEL 3

1,156

19%

LEVEL 4

755

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,586
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,567

LEVEL 1

3,076

47%

LEVEL 2

1,905

29%

LEVEL 3

1,058

16%

LEVEL 4

528

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,902
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,571

LEVEL 1

2,930

45%

LEVEL 2

1,739

26%

LEVEL 3

1,163

18%

LEVEL 4

739

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

56
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

49

35%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

460
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

138

18%

LEVEL 2

173

22%

LEVEL 3

237

31%

LEVEL 4

223

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

483
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 763

LEVEL 1

122

16%

LEVEL 2

158

21%

LEVEL 3

221

29%

LEVEL 4

262

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

279
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 784

LEVEL 1

236

30%

LEVEL 2

269

34%

LEVEL 3

186

24%

LEVEL 4

93

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

327
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

238

30%

LEVEL 2

237

30%

LEVEL 3

186

23%

LEVEL 4

141

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

469
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,656

LEVEL 1

1,395

53%

LEVEL 2

792

30%

LEVEL 3

332

13%

LEVEL 4

137

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

591
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,613

LEVEL 1

1,320

51%

LEVEL 2

702

27%

LEVEL 3

374

14%

LEVEL 4

217

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,783
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,258

LEVEL 1

3,844

47%

LEVEL 2

2,631

32%

LEVEL 3

1,237

15%

LEVEL 4

546

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,337
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,361

LEVEL 1

3,611

43%

LEVEL 2

2,413

29%

LEVEL 3

1,498

18%

LEVEL 4

839

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,798
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,205

LEVEL 1

3,200

35%

LEVEL 2

3,207

35%

LEVEL 3

1,827

20%

LEVEL 4

971

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,462
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,166

LEVEL 1

2,867

31%

LEVEL 2

2,837

31%

LEVEL 3

2,053

22%

LEVEL 4

1,409

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

247
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,410

LEVEL 1

2,458

72%

LEVEL 2

705

21%

LEVEL 3

196

6%

LEVEL 4

51

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

351
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,559

LEVEL 1

2,487

70%

LEVEL 2

721

20%

LEVEL 3

266

7%

LEVEL 4

85

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,895
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,827

LEVEL 1

4,410

41%

LEVEL 2

3,522

33%

LEVEL 3

1,906

18%

LEVEL 4

989

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,610
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,874

LEVEL 1

4,144

38%

LEVEL 2

3,120

29%

LEVEL 3

2,156

20%

LEVEL 4

1,454

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,788

LEVEL 1

1,248

70%

LEVEL 2

390

22%

LEVEL 3

117

7%

LEVEL 4

33

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,851

LEVEL 1

1,210

65%

LEVEL 2

438

24%

LEVEL 3

163

9%

LEVEL 4

40

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

789
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,472

LEVEL 1

941

38%

LEVEL 2

742

30%

LEVEL 3

482

19%

LEVEL 4

307

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

817
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,865

LEVEL 1

562

30%

LEVEL 2

486

26%

LEVEL 3

440

24%

LEVEL 4

377

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,256
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,143

LEVEL 1

4,717

47%

LEVEL 2

3,170

31%

LEVEL 3

1,541

15%

LEVEL 4

715

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,996
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,860

LEVEL 1

4,792

44%

LEVEL 2

3,072

28%

LEVEL 3

1,879

17%

LEVEL 4

1,117

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.