Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 187 HUDSON CLIFFS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

88

20%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

119

26%

LEVEL 4

102

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

105

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

8

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

54

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

54

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

98

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

100

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

37

46%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

118

28%

LEVEL 4

101

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

234
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

105

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

50

22%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

83

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.