Skip to Content
Main content

MS 245 COMPUTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

96

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

102

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

48

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

50

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

14

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

61

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

63

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

95

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

98

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

19

38%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

193
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

99

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

79

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

87

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.