Skip to Content
Main content

PS 84 LILLIAN WEBER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

61

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

82

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

36

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

39

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

25

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

43

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

8

80%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

36

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

54

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

61

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

80

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

22

76%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

27

73%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

59

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

75

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

7

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

53

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

67

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

35

31%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.