Skip to Content
Main content

PS 87 WILLIAM SHERMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

103

27%

LEVEL 4

193

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

42

11%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

218

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

92

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

108

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

101

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

110

58%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

17

57%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

17

41%

LEVEL 4

22

54%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

18

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

140

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

22

9%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

155

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

19

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

19

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

36

12%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

174

58%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

195

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

19

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

54
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

292
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

58

16%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

190

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

333
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

39

10%

LEVEL 3

116

30%

LEVEL 4

217

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

190

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

204

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.