Skip to Content
Main content

PS 163 ALFRED E SMITH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

104

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

113

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

48

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

54

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

56

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

59

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

8

73%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

17

85%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

14

93%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

45

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

59

75%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

101

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

110

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

167
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

103

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

111

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

76

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

84

66%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.