Skip to Content
Main content

PS 183 ROBERT L STEVENSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

130

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

137

58%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

63

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

68

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

67

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

69

59%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

33

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

34

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

82

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

90

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

121

65%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

125

66%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

178
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

123

57%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

199
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

135

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

78%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

124

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

123

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

14

56%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.