PS 126 JACOB AUGUST RIIS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

276
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

88

21%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

167

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

91

21%

LEVEL 4

213

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

64

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

102

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

103

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

111

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

9

60%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

208
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

132

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

238
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

172

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

18

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

27

71%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

28

39%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

70

20%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

159

45%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

46

13%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

208

59%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

246
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

160

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

273
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

52

14%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

205

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

23

39%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

23

35%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

53

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

70

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

114

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

143

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.