Skip to Content
Main content

PS 11 SARAH J GARNETT ES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

66

14%

LEVEL 2

91

20%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

195

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

53

12%

LEVEL 3

102

22%

LEVEL 4

231

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

106

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

29

12%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

121

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

89

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

110

50%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

44

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

53

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

116

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

129

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

16

64%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

39

30%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

75

18%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

189

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

43

11%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

221

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

28

50%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

38

55%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

301
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

61

14%

LEVEL 2

87

19%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

193

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

330
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

48

11%

LEVEL 3

99

23%

LEVEL 4

231

53%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

176

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

266
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

202

66%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

45

34%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.