CHARLES CAMPAGNE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

61

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

49

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

32

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

26

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

29

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

28

44%

LEVEL 4

23

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

17

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

13

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

35

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

27

42%

LEVEL 4

30

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

49

42%

LEVEL 4

49

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

50

42%

LEVEL 4

49

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

53

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

38

39%

LEVEL 4

45

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.