HICKSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

99

23%

LEVEL 2

123

28%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

96

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

104

21%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

131

26%

LEVEL 4

138

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

80

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

130
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

62

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

24

25%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

32

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

61

46%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

56

38%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

93

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

112

25%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

137

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

32

65%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

33

62%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

212
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

116

30%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

264
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

120

27%

LEVEL 3

127

28%

LEVEL 4

137

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

38

78%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

40

78%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

64

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

93

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.