Skip to Content
Main content

EMMA E SHERMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

61

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

93

20%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

146

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

29

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

70

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

32

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

53

23%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

76

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

41

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

98

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

18

26%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

61

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

106

25%

LEVEL 4

143

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

28

82%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

33

70%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

116
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

243
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

107

25%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

143

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

48

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

94

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.