Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

126

37%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

116

40%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

31

51%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.