LITTLE FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

103

30%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

103

26%

LEVEL 2

139

36%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

54

39%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.