Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

199

35%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

228

34%

LEVEL 2

177

27%

LEVEL 3

151

23%

LEVEL 4

110

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

117

38%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

28

41%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

92

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

35

63%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

25

41%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

24

34%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

135

29%

LEVEL 2

147

31%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

129

24%

LEVEL 2

162

30%

LEVEL 3

144

26%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

64

69%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

99

82%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

187
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

194

35%

LEVEL 2

167

30%

LEVEL 3

118

22%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

254
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

223

34%

LEVEL 2

171

26%

LEVEL 3

148

23%

LEVEL 4

106

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

60

24%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

189

42%

LEVEL 2

124

27%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.