Skip to Content
Main content

ARCADIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

113

31%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

61

42%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

72

24%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

83

25%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

27

87%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

124
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

75

24%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

65

41%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

85

41%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.