GLOVERSVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 825

LEVEL 1

388

47%

LEVEL 2

241

29%

LEVEL 3

144

17%

LEVEL 4

52

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,085

LEVEL 1

561

52%

LEVEL 2

301

28%

LEVEL 3

171

16%

LEVEL 4

52

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

193

47%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

278

53%

LEVEL 2

145

28%

LEVEL 3

83

16%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

195

47%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

283

51%

LEVEL 2

156

28%

LEVEL 3

88

16%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

32

45%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

332

47%

LEVEL 2

202

29%

LEVEL 3

121

17%

LEVEL 4

44

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 884

LEVEL 1

457

52%

LEVEL 2

251

28%

LEVEL 3

131

15%

LEVEL 4

45

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

244

37%

LEVEL 2

224

34%

LEVEL 3

136

21%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 892

LEVEL 1

392

44%

LEVEL 2

286

32%

LEVEL 3

162

18%

LEVEL 4

52

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

144

85%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

169

88%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,080

LEVEL 1

557

52%

LEVEL 2

301

28%

LEVEL 3

171

16%

LEVEL 4

51

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

127

30%

LEVEL 3

91

21%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

281

53%

LEVEL 2

150

28%

LEVEL 3

72

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

382

58%

LEVEL 2

174

27%

LEVEL 3

80

12%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.