Skip to Content
Main content

TICONDEROGA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

109

34%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

109

31%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

65

38%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

74

39%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

106

32%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

43

69%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

54

75%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

65

40%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

76

42%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.