HERBERT HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

119

27%

LEVEL 2

155

36%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

137

28%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

96

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

89

21%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

49

63%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

149

35%

LEVEL 3

110

26%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

218
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

123

26%

LEVEL 2

133

28%

LEVEL 3

122

26%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

15

71%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

113

42%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.