Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,103
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,197

LEVEL 1

7,174

59%

LEVEL 2

2,920

24%

LEVEL 3

1,375

11%

LEVEL 4

728

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,691
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,806

LEVEL 1

7,407

58%

LEVEL 2

2,708

21%

LEVEL 3

1,684

13%

LEVEL 4

1,007

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,029
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,926

LEVEL 1

3,355

57%

LEVEL 2

1,542

26%

LEVEL 3

672

11%

LEVEL 4

357

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,325
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,195

LEVEL 1

3,459

56%

LEVEL 2

1,411

23%

LEVEL 3

827

13%

LEVEL 4

498

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,074
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,271

LEVEL 1

3,819

61%

LEVEL 2

1,378

22%

LEVEL 3

703

11%

LEVEL 4

371

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,366
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,611

LEVEL 1

3,948

60%

LEVEL 2

1,297

20%

LEVEL 3

857

13%

LEVEL 4

509

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

130
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

204

44%

LEVEL 2

133

28%

LEVEL 3

88

19%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

164
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

244

46%

LEVEL 2

119

23%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

40

46%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

37

45%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

307
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,213

LEVEL 1

594

49%

LEVEL 2

312

26%

LEVEL 3

192

16%

LEVEL 4

115

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

377
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,257

LEVEL 1

572

46%

LEVEL 2

308

25%

LEVEL 3

207

16%

LEVEL 4

170

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

744
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,101

LEVEL 1

787

37%

LEVEL 2

570

27%

LEVEL 3

427

20%

LEVEL 4

317

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

934
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,246

LEVEL 1

801

36%

LEVEL 2

511

23%

LEVEL 3

503

22%

LEVEL 4

431

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

623
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,928

LEVEL 1

3,977

67%

LEVEL 2

1,328

22%

LEVEL 3

457

8%

LEVEL 4

166

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

820
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,912

LEVEL 1

3,869

65%

LEVEL 2

1,223

21%

LEVEL 3

600

10%

LEVEL 4

220

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

280
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,401

LEVEL 1

1,572

65%

LEVEL 2

549

23%

LEVEL 3

198

8%

LEVEL 4

82

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

372
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,782

LEVEL 1

1,884

68%

LEVEL 2

526

19%

LEVEL 3

260

9%

LEVEL 4

112

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,938
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,409

LEVEL 1

4,919

52%

LEVEL 2

2,552

27%

LEVEL 3

1,251

13%

LEVEL 4

687

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,431
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,723

LEVEL 1

5,018

52%

LEVEL 2

2,274

23%

LEVEL 3

1,510

16%

LEVEL 4

921

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

165
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,788

LEVEL 1

2,255

81%

LEVEL 2

368

13%

LEVEL 3

124

4%

LEVEL 4

41

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

260
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,083

LEVEL 1

2,389

77%

LEVEL 2

434

14%

LEVEL 3

174

6%

LEVEL 4

86

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,013
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,833

LEVEL 1

5,249

53%

LEVEL 2

2,571

26%

LEVEL 3

1,304

13%

LEVEL 4

709

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,571
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,189

LEVEL 1

5,240

51%

LEVEL 2

2,378

23%

LEVEL 3

1,586

16%

LEVEL 4

985

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,364

LEVEL 1

1,925

81%

LEVEL 2

349

15%

LEVEL 3

71

3%

LEVEL 4

19

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,617

LEVEL 1

2,167

83%

LEVEL 2

330

13%

LEVEL 3

98

4%

LEVEL 4

22

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

820
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,414

LEVEL 1

989

41%

LEVEL 2

605

25%

LEVEL 3

461

19%

LEVEL 4

359

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

974
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,242

LEVEL 1

804

36%

LEVEL 2

464

21%

LEVEL 3

505

23%

LEVEL 4

469

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,283
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,783

LEVEL 1

6,185

63%

LEVEL 2

2,315

24%

LEVEL 3

914

9%

LEVEL 4

369

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,717
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,564

LEVEL 1

6,603

63%

LEVEL 2

2,244

21%

LEVEL 3

1,179

11%

LEVEL 4

538

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,101
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,189

LEVEL 1

7,169

59%

LEVEL 2

2,919

24%

LEVEL 3

1,373

11%

LEVEL 4

728

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.