Skip to Content
Main content

ALDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

75

19%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

73

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

71

18%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

93

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

93

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

30

68%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

29

67%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

83

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

42

42%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.