Skip to Content
Main content

TITUSVILLE INTERMEDIATE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

38

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

13

42%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

14

42%

LEVEL 4

13

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

24

40%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

49

19%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

75

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

25

63%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

134
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

77

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

61

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.