HOMER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

141

45%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

61

38%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

82

47%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

138

45%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

135

49%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

32

82%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

93

49%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

56

45%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

68

48%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.