SARANAC CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

119

30%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

43

84%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

49

86%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

70

44%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

69

41%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.