MORAVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

149

37%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

121

28%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

72

36%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

77

38%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

127

31%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

64

79%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

61

78%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

97

41%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.