BOGHT HILLS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

136

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

132

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

59

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

58

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

77

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

74

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

79
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

57

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

77
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

58

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

68

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

65

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

133

50%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

129

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

219
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

132

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

214
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

132

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

36

15%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

126

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

125

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.