LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

82

17%

LEVEL 2

132

27%

LEVEL 3

161

33%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

92

38%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

21

41%

LEVEL 4

21

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

110

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

40

74%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

50

70%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

91

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.