WAVERLY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

148

45%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

168

47%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

84

45%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

84

49%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

139

45%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

164

48%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

124

41%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

108

55%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

118

52%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.