HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

117

38%

LEVEL 4

79

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

111
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

101

42%

LEVEL 4

71

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

22

33%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

19

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.