BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

185

47%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

169

46%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

94

49%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

175

48%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

161

46%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

149

43%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

132

42%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

36

75%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

37

70%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.