Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP TECH VALLEY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

124

44%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

54

44%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

31

28%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

105

43%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

13

54%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.