Skip to Content
Main content

CLARKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

89

26%

LEVEL 2

101

30%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

100

41%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

42

72%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

53

77%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

53

39%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.