HAMPTON BAYS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

141

38%

LEVEL 2

154

41%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

114

35%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

57

33%

LEVEL 2

77

45%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

31

38%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

119

44%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

101

43%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

112

33%

LEVEL 2

149

44%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

91

31%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

29

85%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

23

74%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

62

74%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

57

70%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

36

37%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

116

45%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

98

43%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.