Skip to Content
Main content

ICAHN CHARTER SCHOOL 4 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

68

35%

LEVEL 4

103

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

106

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

61

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

59

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

36

39%

LEVEL 4

42

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

47

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

101
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

57

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

99
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

60

49%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

39

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

35

56%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

100

55%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

102

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

35

66%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

27

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

54

38%

LEVEL 4

68

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

79

52%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.