Skip to Content
Main content

RIVERTON STREET CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

134

25%

LEVEL 2

177

33%

LEVEL 3

141

26%

LEVEL 4

82

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

126

23%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

111

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

68

27%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

204
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

120

25%

LEVEL 2

165

34%

LEVEL 3

127

26%

LEVEL 4

77

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

126

26%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

101

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

88

19%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

117

25%

LEVEL 3

154

33%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

43

55%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

112

25%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.