KIPP NYC WASHINGTON HEIGHTS CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

133

25%

LEVEL 3

215

40%

LEVEL 4

120

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

381
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

100

19%

LEVEL 3

195

37%

LEVEL 4

186

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

124

44%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

201
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

110

42%

LEVEL 4

91

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

57

21%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

95

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

16

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

23

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

299
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

108

24%

LEVEL 3

196

43%

LEVEL 4

103

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

330
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

81

18%

LEVEL 3

170

38%

LEVEL 4

160

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

188

43%

LEVEL 4

117

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

66

15%

LEVEL 3

169

39%

LEVEL 4

175

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

320
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

203

41%

LEVEL 4

117

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

368
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

85

17%

LEVEL 3

182

37%

LEVEL 4

186

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

24

49%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

16

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

299
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

191

39%

LEVEL 4

108

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

349
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

96

20%

LEVEL 3

179

37%

LEVEL 4

170

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.