Skip to Content
Main content

BEGINNING WITH CHILDREN CS II GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

51

36%

LEVEL 4

42

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

74

37%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

19

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

23

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

31

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

25

52%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

27

46%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

35

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

45

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

35

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

61

39%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

14

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

41

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

10

59%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

39

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.