ESSEX COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

534
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,455

LEVEL 1

436

30%

LEVEL 2

485

33%

LEVEL 3

343

24%

LEVEL 4

191

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

569
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,446

LEVEL 1

411

28%

LEVEL 2

466

32%

LEVEL 3

371

26%

LEVEL 4

198

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

274
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

188

27%

LEVEL 2

237

34%

LEVEL 3

177

25%

LEVEL 4

97

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

286
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 705

LEVEL 1

177

25%

LEVEL 2

242

34%

LEVEL 3

179

25%

LEVEL 4

107

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

248

33%

LEVEL 2

248

33%

LEVEL 3

166

22%

LEVEL 4

94

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

283
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

234

32%

LEVEL 2

224

30%

LEVEL 3

192

26%

LEVEL 4

91

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

516
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,407

LEVEL 1

420

30%

LEVEL 2

471

33%

LEVEL 3

330

23%

LEVEL 4

186

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

553
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,404

LEVEL 1

397

28%

LEVEL 2

454

32%

LEVEL 3

360

26%

LEVEL 4

193

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

507
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,160

LEVEL 1

228

20%

LEVEL 2

425

37%

LEVEL 3

324

28%

LEVEL 4

183

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

533
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,141

LEVEL 1

211

18%

LEVEL 2

397

35%

LEVEL 3

344

30%

LEVEL 4

189

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

208

71%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

200

66%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

337
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

145

20%

LEVEL 2

238

33%

LEVEL 3

202

28%

LEVEL 4

135

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

327
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

149

22%

LEVEL 2

209

31%

LEVEL 3

208

30%

LEVEL 4

119

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

291

40%

LEVEL 2

247

34%

LEVEL 3

141

19%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

242
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 761

LEVEL 1

262

34%

LEVEL 2

257

34%

LEVEL 3

163

21%

LEVEL 4

79

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

569
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,441

LEVEL 1

407

28%

LEVEL 2

465

32%

LEVEL 3

371

26%

LEVEL 4

198

14%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

532
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,447

LEVEL 1

431

30%

LEVEL 2

484

33%

LEVEL 3

341

24%

LEVEL 4

191

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

568
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,438

LEVEL 1

405

28%

LEVEL 2

465

32%

LEVEL 3

370

26%

LEVEL 4

198

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.