SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

229

33%

LEVEL 2

214

30%

LEVEL 3

165

23%

LEVEL 4

96

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

203

29%

LEVEL 2

229

33%

LEVEL 3

163

23%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

118

31%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

108

29%

LEVEL 2

117

32%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

15

56%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

217

34%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

143

22%

LEVEL 4

85

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

187

30%

LEVEL 2

212

34%

LEVEL 3

147

23%

LEVEL 4

86

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

139

24%

LEVEL 2

195

33%

LEVEL 3

158

27%

LEVEL 4

96

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

131

22%

LEVEL 2

209

35%

LEVEL 3

156

26%

LEVEL 4

100

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

90

78%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

72

73%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

76

24%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

153

40%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

139

35%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

260
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

219

32%

LEVEL 2

212

31%

LEVEL 3

165

24%

LEVEL 4

95

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.