LIVONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

117

21%

LEVEL 2

135

25%

LEVEL 3

161

29%

LEVEL 4

135

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

106

22%

LEVEL 2

107

23%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

112

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

285
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

126

24%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

132

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

100

23%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

108

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

71

14%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

133

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

101

24%

LEVEL 3

148

35%

LEVEL 4

112

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

46

81%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

41

85%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

117

33%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

109

38%

LEVEL 4

87

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

260
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

104

22%

LEVEL 2

104

22%

LEVEL 3

148

32%

LEVEL 4

112

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.