JOHN KENNEDY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

101

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

41

24%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

57

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

85

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

43

14%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

101

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

31

84%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

200
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

101

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

171
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

73

22%

LEVEL 2

89

27%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

61

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

40

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

199
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

101

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.