Skip to Content
Main content

NEIL ARMSTRONG SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

15

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

28

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

16

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

9

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

42

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.