Skip to Content
Main content

ROGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

100

30%

LEVEL 4

113

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

73

21%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

124

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

49

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

57

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

64

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

67

37%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

90

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

31

14%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

94

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

11

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

111

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

123

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

113

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

124

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

81

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

90

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

38

28%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.