HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

474
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

87

12%

LEVEL 2

162

22%

LEVEL 3

229

32%

LEVEL 4

245

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

511
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

75

10%

LEVEL 2

145

20%

LEVEL 3

244

33%

LEVEL 4

267

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

214
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

102

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

233
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

59

18%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

116

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

117

30%

LEVEL 4

143

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

278
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

86

21%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

151

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

11

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

446
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

70

11%

LEVEL 2

146

22%

LEVEL 3

214

32%

LEVEL 4

232

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

473
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

61

9%

LEVEL 2

126

19%

LEVEL 3

230

35%

LEVEL 4

243

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

461
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

46

7%

LEVEL 2

136

21%

LEVEL 3

219

34%

LEVEL 4

242

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

492
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

38

6%

LEVEL 2

117

18%

LEVEL 3

229

35%

LEVEL 4

263

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

41

51%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

37

44%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

472
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

85

12%

LEVEL 2

161

22%

LEVEL 3

228

32%

LEVEL 4

244

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

509
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

71

10%

LEVEL 2

142

20%

LEVEL 3

243

34%

LEVEL 4

266

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

418
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

122

21%

LEVEL 3

196

34%

LEVEL 4

222

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

448
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

98

17%

LEVEL 3

210

36%

LEVEL 4

238

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.