COBBLES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

101

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

30

12%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

149

60%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

52

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

68

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

41

37%

LEVEL 4

49

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

81

62%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

90

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

129

65%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

82

37%

LEVEL 4

100

46%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

146

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

178
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

101

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

6

86%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

90

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

132

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

17

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.